I’m thinking about eliminating religious themes from
my books and stories. Why? A very good question. Religion is a turn off to many
readers. A reader may be going along, becoming interested in the plot and
characters and then, bam! God pokes his head in and the reader says sayonara.
It isn’t every reader, but enough to make a difference. I know it’s true
because reviews say so. Sometimes the reviewer is very explicit, writing
something like: “I was interested until the author started bringing God (or
Christianity, or religion) into the story. Then I became angry and put it
down.” At least such reviewers are honest. I believe, however, that their
reviews say more about themselves than the story.
Then, there are the reviewers who find another
reason to dislike the story, but implicit in their comments is a strong dislike
for anything that even suggests that there is a God out there. They are
offended that God has any interest in what happens in this world. Such readers
may make remarks like: the characters were flat or the plot didn’t interest me,
usually coupled with comments that reveal their complete disdain for all things
religious, particularly Christian. Comments such as “Too many biblical
references or the characters seemed too knowledgeable about God” are common.
My problem is that I find it hard to write about
anything apart from God. All I need to do is look out the window and I see his
presence. I tried in my most recent book to tone down the religion. “Minotaur
Revisited” features the Minotaur of Greek mythology living through thousands of
years of history, coming in contact with historical characters, some biblical,
some real and some fictional. There is an undercurrent of religious questioning
that runs along with the story. The Minotaur experiences God and gods during
many of his adventures and is never sure what it all means or if he should
believe in any god, be it Zeus or Yahweh. Yet, what to me are subtle references
to religion strike other readers as outright proselytizing. This is never my
intention. Every religious reference I make is, at least in my opinion,
integral to the plot and/or character.
“Future Hope”, Book One in the ITP series, carries
the protagonist, Major David Sanders, and the reader to a fictional Eden where
there are sharp contrasts between that “mythical” world and the futuristic
earth. One world has forgotten God, while the other can’t live a moment without
seeing His presence. Major Sanders’ physical and spiritual journey eventually
leads to a clash between the two worlds. God and religion are integral to the
plot and elimination of either would gut the story.
“Joshua and Aaron: ITP Book Two” brings God and
religion down to a more personal level. Joshua Smith is thrust into the middle
of a cosmic battle between God and Satan. Once again, religion is central and
trying to eliminate God and religion would decimate the story. I suppose the
story line could be altered from God vs. Satan to: good vs. bad, or the Force
vs. the Dark Side, or Dark vs. Light. Perhaps such alterations would widen the
appeal of the ITP series, but it would also trivialize the underlying theme.
God vs. Satan is a battle that has been raging since the beginnings of the
Bible. Replacing such an important concept with abstract notions of good and
evil would weaken the impact of these stories. God vs. Satan, biblical ideas
and Jesus ask the reader to make a choice, something “Star Wars” or “Lord of
the Rings” never do. After all, “Star Wars” takes place “a long time ago in a
galaxy far, far away” and “Lord of the Rings” is set in Middle Earth a land
filled with Elves, Wizards, Hobbits and Orcs. Even though “Future Hope” and
“Joshua and Aaron” unfold one hundred fifty years from now, it is on earth
where the battle is fought; an earth that is a logical extension of the world
we inhabit today.
There is no question that god and religion are
integral to the ITP series. But what about books I’ve written about surgery? A
review of “Behind the Mask” posted on Amazon.com carries the heading “too much
God.” The writer states that he enjoyed much of the writing and found the book
to be informative, but God popping up at various points was distracting,
because he was not a religious person. My problem is that I cannot look at this
world, look at humanity, look at the amazing biological apparatus called Homo Sapiens and see it apart from God.
We humans are truly “Fearfully and Wonderfully made.” Therefore, “Behind the
Mask” and “Under the Drapes” include reference to God within the context and
flow of the narrative. I don’t believe that such references are excessive or unnecessary.
Rather, my use of religion and God reveals their importance in this world, as
well as my life and work. The goal of these books is to bring the reader into
this rarely seen world of disease and blood and life and death. I cannot
accomplish this goal apart from God, because I see his hand in everything.
“Too much God?” I don’t think this is possible.
You state that you are thinking about eliminating God from your writings. Write what you feel inspired to create. I enjoyed both medical books about your career and experiences.
ReplyDeleteBut not interested in your fiction books seem mystical. Love your blogs.
I am not really going to eliminate religion and God from my writing. "Minotaur Revisited" is not mystical at all. More of a romp through history.
ReplyDeleteInteresting thoughts. Isn't is amazing how much our readers really influence our writing? I like your references to God in your books because it feels naturally. It's a part of your writing because it's so deeply a part of your life...as it should be.
ReplyDeleteJust a thought:
ReplyDeleteCould it be because God is number one in your life
that you " took the call" to help that woman in ER
when everyone else was " busy" or refused?